Showing posts with label performance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label performance. Show all posts

Saturday, March 19, 2011

The Celebration of Emptiness

Yves Klein: Anthropométries

The French artist, Yves Klein was among the pioneers of performance, minimal, and pop art. He did not only use the result of his work as an artistic piece but he included the whole artistic process as creating something new and different. For instance, in the case of a series of paintings, he made a performance out of the creation of the works. In 1949, he composed The Monotone Symphony, a single 20-minute sustained chord followed by a 20-minute silence, and played it during these events.

Klein was a highly self-conscious artist, so when he realized that his audience perceives his multicolored paintings as mere interior decorations, he decided to reduce his world to one color only: blue. The color later became his emblematic feature, conveying a sense of infinity and otherworldliness.

Besides The Void (an empty space in a wardrobe), one of his most famous works was Anthropometries, which is a series of paintings created by the naked bodies of women. Klein was fascinated by experimenting, and he often did so regarding the tool with which he can apply paint on the canvas. In a little while, he developed the idea of "living brushes" (female bodies). He controled the process of creation as a conductor: they made the women, colored in blue paint, roll over, squirm, or being dragged over his canvases in a ritualistic manner. He regarded sponges or brushes (thus, these bodies as well) as sanctified objects because they impregnate by being impregnated. He pondered on this in the sense of artistic effect: he wanted his viewers to be impregnated by his art with the susceptibility of sponges. Strangely enough, Anthropométries do gets stripped from raptorous eroticism, and conveys a more foundamental meaning by the plunging, splashing, dreaming, and levitating bodies it displays. As Klein himself put it: "My paintings are but the ashes of my art."


Banksy: Christ with Shopping Bags

Graffiti has always been a controversial genre, since it was frowned upon, being considered as a form of vandalism. It was an underground movement and an ephemeral form of art for a long time, but lately it has been admitted to the artistic canon. Amusingly, one example for this breakthrough is the graffiti-project in the London underground and the New York subway.

The British artist, Banksy is infamous for his tongue-in-cheek works which usually convey messages with strong social connotations. He looks at social tendencies from a critical point of view. Just like many contemporary artists, mainly the ones in the field of street art, which is considered extremely direct and forceful, he uses shock as a tool for revelation.

Christ with Shopping Bags is a stencil of the crucifixion, depicting Jesus with two huge bundles of gifts in his pierced hands. The graffiti is an imprint of an era where "God is dead", yet, holidays still florish. Banksy's work suggests that holidays, especially Christmas, have lost their meaning and they became the celebration of consumer society, where people's sentimentalism or religious belief are used as tools for gaining profit. They are more of industrial and commercial happenigns than intimate family events: they became oversentimentalized and empty at the same time. Also, it is clear that just as he violated the sanctified image of Christ, people make products out of everything, without giving it a second thought. Everything is possible, and nothing is untouchable if it sells well.


Tuesday, February 22, 2011

"Beauty is truth, truth beauty"

Marina Abramovic – Art Must be Beautiful, Artist Must be Beautiful

The first piece of art I’d like to discuss is a fairly extraordinary one. One reason for this is the fact that it is a performance and not a handmade object that can be carried around or put on a wall. The title is pretty telling: Art must be Beautiful, Artist must be Beautiful, and it was made by Marina Abramovic, a performance artist of Serbian origin. I think it is the perfect work to start my blog with, since it touches upon the evergreen dilemma of the majority of artists and the audience as well: is aesthetic pleasure the main object of art? The Romantic poet, Keats gave a categorical answer for that question in his famous poem, Ode on a Grecian Urn: “Beauty is truth / truth beauty” - he wrote.

Still, in 1975, Abramovic sees it quite differently. In her video, she brushes her hair in a frustrated and desperate manner: she holds metal combs in both of her hands and brushes her hair until it becomes messy and rumpled. The expression "shock headed" suits her appearance perfectly. Apparently, she is not the least concerned by the possibility of harming herself with the combs. Throughout this ritual, she repeats the sentence “Art must be beautiful, artist must be beautiful” like a mantra. Her performance gives an insight into the ars poetica of the modern artist from a double perspective: it deals with the problems of a contemporary artist, "aggravated" by the fact that she is a female one.

We could say that it is a double-attack on conventions as well: she challenges the traditional beauty-notion that is forced upon and expected from both art and women in general. Her naked body becomes a work of art itself which refuses to be pretty and empty, either as a living being or a piece of art. Her work could not really be accused of lack of meaning since her message is very strong and clear. In her retrospective called The Artist is Present (2010), she claims that beauty has nothing to do with art, since art has to be disturbing and full of questions, and, above all: true. Most probably, she and Keats would have had a rather disturbing colloquy about the "beauty truth, truth beauty" matter.


Marcel Duchamp: Fountain

The infamous Fountain, which is a plain white urinal, is one of the most cheeky and scandalous works of art of the 20th century. It being a piece of art is a controversial issue not only because of the dismissive attitude of the audience but also owing to the fact that Duchamp was one of the most significant members of Dada, which was an overt anti-art movement. Although the Fountain is undoubtedly a flillip, somehow it justified the existence of readymade artistic objects and established the concept of found art. As it was written in 1917 in the editorial of the second issue of The Blind Man, the fact that the artist chose this object as a work of art enabled it to gain a higher meaning and a ticket to the pantheon of acclaimed masterpieces. Thus, the artist acts as a reinventor in the case of readymade objects.

This ideology is an idiosyncratic characteristic of modern art: the conceptual value and the nawfangled nature of the piece is much more appreciated than the craftsmanship or the technical skills of the artist. This shift puts the audience in an undeniably more demanding position: they have to muster their creativity, associative skills, and imagination in order to be able to interpret such a work in an intellectual manner. The fact that the original Fountain disappeared a short time after its initial exhibition; also, that Duchamp made several replicas of it, proves the same thing. Thoughts, ideas, and the conceptual powerfulness of a piece of art no longer roots in its physical being or appearance. Thus, it does not have to be preserved and treated in a fashion as if it was the most perfect and unrepeatable realization of the artist's idea and talent.

Strangely enough, if one is willing to give a second thought or a second chance to the Fountain, its message could be quite interesting. Turned upside down, one of the most coarse practical objects, the urinal, becomes a curvy and delicately shaped article, which is associated with fountains with the help of the title. This might reveal how thin the line is between the low and ordinary and the sublime and aesthetically pleasing. Also, the fact that the creation of a work like the Fountain did not require an artistic vein (not in the traditional sense at least) may be inspirational for people with no particular hand skills but a vivid imagination, since it makes the creation of something intellectually exciting possible, and opens many doors for ways of using creativity.
Still, one thing should not be forgotten: sometimes the manic attempts at discovering a majestic and profound meaning in modern works of art are just simply in vain. Contemporary art has a sense of humor; thus, we, the audience are allowed to laugh together with the artist. Exhilarating, isn't it?